First check why a naheffingsaanslag was imposed. For VAT it may be an estimate after a missing return, an unprocessed payment or a substantive disagreement. These causes require different actions. Filing the return later is not the same as objecting to every error, and lower tax does not automatically cancel every penalty. A tax lawyer can help with a disputed tax base, several periods or a complex penalty question. This guide focuses on VAT; wage taxes and other taxes paid on returns require their own rules and documents.
Sources (3)
On this page
1. Identify the assessment, period and components
Read the assessment number, period, tax, penalties and any interest separately. Establish whether an estimate relates to a missing return or an inspector’s substantive adjustment. A naheffingsaanslag is not the same decision as a provisional income tax assessment or navorderingsaanslag. Do not automatically copy your approach from an earlier dispute about another tax.
Compare the assessment with the return actually sent and its acknowledgement. If nothing was received, establish what remains to be filed. If a return was filed, check the correct period and business. Opening the wrong quarter in software can make you think everything is settled while the letter concerns another period. Keep this comparison as the start of your file.
2. Treat a missing return as a separate corrective step
The Belastingdienst explains that a forgotten VAT return may produce an estimated assessment. Official instructions require you to file it afterwards even if no VAT seems payable or you expect a refund. This matters: no turnover does not mean no return is required where a filing duty exists. Use the appropriate business procedure.
After a nil return or refund return, the official correction route requires payment of the imposed filing-default penalty. If VAT is payable but less than estimated, it lists three amounts: the declared VAT, filing-default penalty and payment-default penalty on actual VAT. According to the guidance read, the latter is 3%, with a €50 minimum. Use the assessment’s payment reference. A penalty you contest needs its own examination; filing later does not remove that dispute.
3. Check payment and reference using evidence
A bank debit may help prove a transfer, but also check date, account and reference. The Belastingdienst expressly treats an incorrect reference as a separate situation. Gather exact details and any returned payment. Recalling payment of roughly the same amount does not show it belongs to this period and business.
For a wrong reference, official guidance describes an objection identifying the reference used and payment proof. Check the deadline and any deferral request. Send copies and retain original banking records. A call may help trace money, but without confirmation do not assume a formal objection or deferral is arranged too. Keep every relevant response in the same file.
4. Develop a substantive VAT disagreement separately
Sometimes receipt of the return or payment is not the problem: the tax calculation is. Identify the turnover, input VAT or other adjusted item. Check invoices, agreements and periods used. An accounting entry does not answer every VAT question. Legal classification may be central to an exemption, cross-border supply or disputed deduction.
For each adjustment explain the outcome sought and supporting document. Make any accepted part visible. Saying only that the bill is far too high is not a verifiable defence. Align accounting and legal support. An accountant may prepare figures while a lawyer assesses the legal question and procedural position; agree who sends the final explanation.
5. Choose the right objection and protect six weeks
The Belastingdienst specifies six weeks after the date of a VAT assessment or decision to object. For an objection to a payment, it instead refers to the payment date. These differences make identifying the challenged element important. For an assessment, official guidance lists Mijn Belastingdienst Zakelijk, a PDF form and a letter, among other details. Check the current instructions for your decision.
The letter must include date, name, address, assessment number, reason and signature. If complete grounds are not ready in time, request later supplementation in the timely objection. Retain dispatch and receipt evidence. A supplementary return or late original return does not replace an objection to an independently incorrect decision without assessment. Examine their interaction before the deadline passes unused.
6. Keep penalties and payment deferral separately verifiable
VAT filing and payment are separate duties. Correcting the tax calculation may therefore leave a filing- or payment-default penalty issue. Check the penalties actually imposed and whether you challenge their substance. The default-penalty guide discusses culpability and evidence in more depth. Do not assume a lower estimated tax amount cancels every remaining element.
For the nil, refund or lower-VAT situations above, the next step is specific: if the Kennisgeving Omzetbelasting Vermindering arrives within two weeks after the assessment date, that correction route requires no deferral request. If it has not arrived after two weeks, request written deferral from the Landelijk Incasso Centrum. A Mededeling Omzetbelasting confirming penalty payment does not replace the reduction notice. For substantive objection, request deferral identifying the disputed amount and check confirmation; assume no general collection freeze.
7. Fictional example: no turnover but an estimated assessment
Suppose a business had no turnover for a quarter and therefore filed no VAT return. A high estimated assessment with penalties follows. The owner wants to ignore it because the estimate does not match the accounts. That leaves both the missing return and formal assessment of the decisions unattended.
A focused response checks filing duty and period, submits correct data and reads which tax, penalties and payment steps remain. If a decision is incorrect, the proper objection route is assessed in time. This fictional example guarantees no cancellation of every penalty. It shows why nil turnover, a nil return and no return are three different facts when investigating an assessment.
8. Checklist for examining the assessment
Give the adviser tax documents and payment information. Put the assessment date and most urgent action first. Explicitly ask what correction resolves and which decision must additionally be challenged.
- Complete assessment with period, number, tax and individual penalties.
- Return submitted and acknowledgement, or overview of missing information.
- Calculation, invoices and support for substantively disputed VAT items.
- Banking details with payment date, account, reference and possible reversal.
- Later reductions, notifications, objections and deferral requests with receipts.
Frequently asked questions
Must I file a return without turnover?
The Belastingdienst says an existing VAT filing duty applies even without VAT charged or received. Check your duty and period.
Does reducing the estimate cancel every penalty?
Not automatically. Filing and payment default need separate attention. Read what the reduction actually changes and which penalty remains.
Is a supplementary return the same as an objection?
Do not assume that without assessment. Substantive correction and formal defence against a decision are different steps with their own issues.
What if I already paid using a wrong reference?
Gather payment proof and the reference used. The Belastingdienst describes an objection route and also advises requesting deferral for this situation. Protect the applicable deadline.
Sources
These sources relate to this page. For a specific case, check current rules and your own documents.
- Belastingdienst — btw-naheffingsaanslag ontvangen Accessed: 2026-10-23
- Belastingdienst — bezwaar omzetbelasting Accessed: 2026-10-23
- Belastingdienst — btw betaalverzuim Accessed: 2026-10-23
Legal review
Not legally reviewed yetThis version has not been reviewed by a lawyer or legal professional. Checking sources or editing text is not legal approval.
Editorial team Tax law in the Netherlands
We connect explanations to sources and record targeted changes. Legal review is attributed only to the actual reviewed version, with a real reviewer, date and scope. Human legal review of these articles remains open.

Ricardo van der Spoel
Editorial responsibility · Editorial organisation and technology